Annex V: the State of Complementarian Justice

Annex V: The Practical Model of the State of Complementarian Justice (Sovereignty and Legitimacy)

Introduction

The State of Complementarian Justice represents an innovative vision for reconstructing the state based on existential rights and complementarian rationality. This model relies on a balanced organizational structure that merges historical sovereignty and active sovereignty, ensuring justice, stability, and the protection of the rights of current and future generations.

1. Structure of the State of Complementarian Justice

A. Supra-Political Council (Historical Sovereignty):

  • Represents the historical people and ensures the protection of future generations’ rights.
  • Operates based on complementarian rationality and existential rights as foundations for governance and legislation.
  • Oversees the performance of the Political Council to ensure alignment with existential rights.

B. Political Council (Active Sovereignty):

  • Represents the current populace and manages the state’s daily affairs.
  • Functions under the supervision of the Supra-Political Council to prevent violations of existential rights.

2. Applied Models Within the State

A. Decision-Making in the Supra-Political Council:

  • Reviews all legislations to ensure alignment with existential rights.
  • Decisions are made unanimously, reflecting complete rational consensus.

B. Policy-Making in the Political Council:

  • Focuses on implementing executive policies within the framework of historical sovereignty.
  • Decisions are made by majority vote but remain subject to review by the Supra-Political Council.

C. Relationship Between the Two Councils:

  • Complementary Relationship: The Supra-Political Council establishes core principles, while the Political Council formulates and implements policies.

3. Legitimacy and Sovereignty

A. Legitimacy:

  • Derived from the state’s commitment to existential rights as the universal minimum standard.
  • Historical sovereignty provides legitimacy for major decisions.
  • Active sovereignty ensures legitimacy in daily operations.

B. Sovereignty:

  1. Individual Sovereignty:
    • Guarantees individual freedom within the framework of existential rights.
  2. Historical Sovereignty:
    • Ensures the protection of shared resources and formulation of fundamental laws.
  3. Active Sovereignty:
    • Focuses on policy execution and resource management.

4. Enhanced Democratic Mechanisms

A. Election of Supra-Political Council Members:

  • Members are directly elected by the people based on competence and wisdom.
  • Candidates must demonstrate integrity and independence from narrow political interests.
  • The council includes representatives of all subcultures to ensure inclusivity.

B. Election of Political Council Members:

  • Elections emphasize administrative competence and geographical representation.
  • Decisions are made by majority vote but remain subject to the Supra-Political Council’s oversight.

5. Oversight Mechanisms

A. Oversight by the Supra-Political Council:

  • Monitors legislation and executive policies to ensure alignment with existential rights.
  • Holds the authority to reject or amend policies that violate rights.

B. Use of Technology:

  • The state employs artificial intelligence systems programmed according to complementarian rationality.
  • These systems analyze policies to ensure compatibility with existential rights.

6. Mechanisms for Balancing Sovereignty and Legitimacy

A. Legislative Balance:

  • Any policy or law must gain the approval of the Supra-Political Council to ensure legitimacy.

B. Oversight Balance:

  • The Political Council is restricted from crossing the red lines of existential rights, ensuring effective governance.

C. Executive Balance:

  • Complete separation of executive and legislative powers to maintain transparency.

7. Cooperative Models Within the State

A. Cooperation Among Subcultures:

  • Guarantees representation of all cultures in the Supra-Political Council.
  • Encourages dialogue and understanding between various groups.

B. Cooperation Between Individuals and the State:

  • Every individual has the right to directly lodge complaints, supported by simplified existential rights that are easily observable.
  • Digital platforms provide transparent and swift procedures.

8. The Role of the Rights Treasury and Tax Treasury

A. Rights Treasury:

  • Managed by the Supra-Political Council to support marginalized groups.
  • Funded by a share of corporate profits tied to the historical people’s rights.

B. Tax Treasury:

  • Managed by the Political Council to fund essential public services such as education and healthcare.
  • Funded by taxes levied on services provided by the state.

Conclusion

The model of the State of Complementarian Justice offers a comprehensive and balanced vision that reconstructs the concepts of sovereignty and legitimacy on the foundations of existential rights and complementarian rationality. This vision ensures the sustainability of justice and stability through a structure that merges historical and active sovereignty, making it an innovative model for addressing contemporary challenges and building a more just and integrated state.